Time and again spirited discussions happen on internet fora pertaining to a examination of the status of a variety of jyotish parameters, including chara dasha (a signal based longitudinal period astrofactor) along with karakamsha (the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most complex planet in longitude) is set. As characteristically happens, a number of the discussants begun to branch to other side discussions which really had nothing more related to the first questions or topics and some actually became a bit exercised and emotional, as additionally often happens on the internet where attention spans of weeks and days have been required so as to get to the underside of things and where sometimes a topic is being discussed on many distinct boards and many topics simultaneously on a particular board! As too is typical, nothing was resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their insecurities concerning these topics coming up again and again and directing visitors to writings etc.. Alas, the ya-hoo forums/fora are such that just limited searching of previous messages is possible without losing all one's hair, and also the archives are often maintained on another yahoo site therefore that this does not help matters when everybody wants is to have a quick summary of what the others are already using and if possible their reasons for adopting a certain position! This latter brings forth more gall than good advice even though the aim of the individual posing the question may have been very noble and not at all confrontational.
Somewhere, over the path with this former quest, another topic got endured and began questioning the use of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes which are the core of jyotish and have already been used by tropical astrologers at the kind of harmonic graphs. This is some thing which is found in Jyotish going back to almost the first memories of even the earliest members at the discussion that finally admitted to this kind of situation. I myself, though myself perhaps not that senior, have experienced horoscopes that were drawn from the century before last where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha along with dashamsha and thus on and more to the point had commented on these graphs in his reading. kalyan chart Therefore, at the least some individuals had been utilizing varga-charts a couple of hundred decades ago and possibly even just before those times.
Somewhere during the conversation, in another of these lists, one of the members made available a post in which the writer had voiced notions to the contrary, i.e., vargas should not be used at a graph format. A discussion ensued which side stepped the important and relevant matter of the technical merits of using of navamsha varga like a second chart. A few individuals asked for proofs in classics which indicates that early jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY rashi chakra has to be properly used along with varga placements should just be useful for discovering the features of planets .
One of those associates attracted on all astrologers' attention that Parashara had clarified very clearly just how to determine bhavas in the rashi chart (ascendant, 10th house and then trisection of those arcs, etc. . V of BPHS). This was indeed true and a positive step forward in the discussion. There were also parallel discussions going which were rehashing that BPHS was not original and was perhaps not even a timeless and compiled by one or even a set of'latter day saints' [my term, not the first poster!] In Jyotish and consequently cannot be treated as a timeless. Evidently, there is some support for this as could be similarly expected if someone should happen to create a comment that Jyotish was only a derivative of Babylonian astrology that the army that was included with Alexander attracted to India. A topic that has been acknowledged to bring even sedate jyotishis out on the"warpath!"
To those who have been interested and intrigued by this, there appeared to be just two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Only Rashi horoscopes ought to be used. Additional varga kundalis were the product of corrupted comprehension of the classics which themselves many concur might not have lived in pure shape [while a few of them have thankfully lived in fairly great shape1]. I don't know just how a lot with this iceberg postulate is based facts and just how much is wishful fiction. As stated by the purists of the particular stream of thought, vargas MUST only be utilised as measures of qualitative and quantitative strength of planets and for that consideration of this deities and primal forces people represent however, perhaps not at the kind of a horoscope and clearly no significant consideration has to be directed at aspects and bhava considerations. Just for clarity, they would assert, for instance, that as the second dwelling lord in navamsha is a significant indicator, the simple fact that it is set in the 2nd navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2nd house in navamsha graph ) is not important.
(b) Irrespective of whether explicitly described or not, one other stream of thinking asserts that varga kundalis have an important part to play in Jyotish and possibly are of significant usefulness in identifying chief mandates matters pertaining to the prescription given by sages. In other words, navamsha chart, by way of instance, would hold significant influence within topics of marriage and spouse, whilst saptamsha chart would be of import at the examination of children in a specific nativity's reading. These Vargas ought to be examined in a graph format.
In actuality, the majority of these utilized concepts from both (a) and (b) streams. There appeared to be a few different people who entirely denied that the veracity of idea flow (b) and also a few were a little taciturn about it, perhaps to prevent acrimony and getting ensnared in the controversy. Or there were other reasons, known only for them.