Time and again spirited negotiations happen on internet fora regarding an study of the status of a variety of jyotish parameters, including chara dasha (a signal based longitudinal period astrofactor) and karakamsha (the navamsha where the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is set. As happens, a few of the discussants begun to branch into other side discussions that had nothing more to do with the initial questions or themes along with some became a little exercised and emotional, as additionally usually happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks are required to be able to get to the bottom of things and where sometimes a topic will be discussed on a lot of diverse boards and many issues simultaneously on a given board! As too is average, nothing has been resolved, and a few of the regulars began expressing their insecurities concerning such topics coming up again and again again and directing visitors to writings . Alas, the yahoo forums/fora are such that only limited searching of previous messages is possible without losing all of one's hair, and also the archives are often kept onto yet another yahoo site which means this will not help things when everybody wants is to receive a quick overview of what the others are already using and if possible their good reasons for adopting a certain position! This latter brings forth more gall than good advice though the aim of the individual posing the question might have been very noble and maybe not in any way confrontational. Knowing Jyotish does not protect one from harbouring Neurotic characteristics!
Somewhere, along the path with the former pursuit, yet another issue got endured and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the heart of jyotish and have been used by tropical astrologers at the kind of harmonic graphs. Now this really is something which is utilized in Jyotish going straight back to almost the initial memories of even the oldest members in the discussion who finally confessed to this type of case. I myself, though myself maybe not that mature, have seen horoscopes which were drawn from the century before last where the jyotishi had drawn the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and thus on and much more importantly had commented on these graphs in his hearing. kalyan matka panel chart Therefore, at the very least many people were utilizing varga-charts a handful of hundred decades ago and possibly maybe even just before these times.
Somewhere throughout the conversation, in another of the lists, a number of the associates left available an article in which the writer had voiced notions to the contrary, i.e., vargas must not be used at a chart format. A conversation ensued which side stepped the important and pertinent matter of these technical virtues of using of navamsha varga being an secondary chart. A couple of individuals asked for proofs in classics that indicates that early jyotishis advocated of varga chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY rashi chakra must be properly used along with varga placements should just be used for determining the advantages of planets etc..
Now, those who have studied BPHS would understand , that 16 vargas had been characterized by the Sage beginning with rashi ehich is known as'kshetra' (field or area) etc. One of those associates brought on each of astrologers' attention that Parashara had clarified very clearly how exactly to find out bhavas from the rashi chart (ascendant, 10th dwelling and then trisection of their arcs, etc. in Chapter V of BPHS). This was really true and also a positive step ahead of the discussion. There were also parallel discussions going on which were rehashing the point that BPHS wasn't original and was perhaps not a good classic and compiled by one or a set of'latterday saints' [my term, not the first poster!] In Jyotish and therefore cannot be treated like being a classic. Apparently, there is some support for this could be similarly expected if somebody were to create a comment that Jyotish had been nothing but a derivative of Babylonian astrology that the army that came with Alexander brought to India. An issue that has been understood to attract even sedate jyotishis out on the"war-path!"
To those who have been still interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there appeared to be just two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Only Rashi horoscopes ought to be used. Additional varga kundalis would be the item of tainted comprehension of the classics which themselves many agree may not have endured in pristine form [although a number of them have mercifully survived in reasonably good shape1]. I don't know how a lot with this iceberg postulate is based facts and just how much is wishful fiction. As stated by the purists of this stream of thought, vargas MUST simply be utilized as measures of qualitative and quantitative strength of planets and also for that consideration of the deities and primal forces people represent BUT maybe not at the kind of a horoscope and clearly no critical consideration must be directed at aspects and bhava considerations. Just for clarity, they would assert, for instance, that while the 2 nd house lord in navamsha is a significant index, the fact that it is set in the 2nd navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2 nd dwelling in navamsha graph ) isn't significant.
(b) Irrespective of if explicitly clarified or not, the other flow of thinking maintains that varga kundalis have an important part to play in Jyotish and possibly are of significant usefulness in differentiating primary mandates matters regarding the prescription given by sages. In other words, navamsha graph, by way of example, would hold significant influence on matters of spouse and marriage, while saptamsha graph would be of import from the study of children in a given nativity's reading. These Vargas should be analyzed in a graph format.
I do not recall anyone in the'camp (b)' saying that the very first portion of (a) isn't correct, especially, the Varga rankings must be contemplated, per se, to get an study of strength and quality of a globe as prescribed over the Jyotish frame. There appeared to be some other individuals who totally denied that the veracity of idea stream (b) and a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps to prevent acrimony and getting ensnared from the controversy. Or there were some other reasons, known only to them.